<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: processing IMAP folder on a regular basis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pepa.info/php-html-css/imap/processing-imap-folder-on-a-regular-basis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pepa.info/php-html-css/imap/processing-imap-folder-on-a-regular-basis/</link>
	<description>Petr 'PePa' Pavel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J. Crowder</title>
		<link>http://blog.pepa.info/php-html-css/imap/processing-imap-folder-on-a-regular-basis/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J. Crowder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pepa.info/php-html-css/uncategorized/processing-imap-folder-on-a-regular-basis/#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>Very good point about the sent date vs. the delivered date!

Regarding date formats, I wonder if many/most IMAP servers support the unambiguous ISO 8601 date format?  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601)  To my mind, anyone creating software that has even a remote possibility of having to deal with multiple formats (and I&#039;d say IMAP server software qualifies!) should always support ISO 8601 and use it internally...  Sadly, though, to the extent it&#039;s even covered by the RFC (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html) -- and why do we keep making the mistake of not defining these things?! -- it looks like they&#039;ve done exactly the wrong thing and require DD-MM-YYYY (at least, that&#039;s how it looks to me in the Formal Syntax section, but I&#039;m not an expert at ABNF)...

-- T.J. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point about the sent date vs. the delivered date!</p>
<p>Regarding date formats, I wonder if many/most IMAP servers support the unambiguous ISO 8601 date format?  (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601</a>)  To my mind, anyone creating software that has even a remote possibility of having to deal with multiple formats (and I&#8217;d say IMAP server software qualifies!) should always support ISO 8601 and use it internally&#8230;  Sadly, though, to the extent it&#8217;s even covered by the RFC (<a href="http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html</a>) &#8212; and why do we keep making the mistake of not defining these things?! &#8212; it looks like they&#8217;ve done exactly the wrong thing and require DD-MM-YYYY (at least, that&#8217;s how it looks to me in the Formal Syntax section, but I&#8217;m not an expert at ABNF)&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; T.J. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

